AI Datacenters
Community research on the AI datacenter ecosystem — facilities, operators, capacity, power sources, water draw, suppliers, and energy deals. Add a facility you know about, verify what others submit.
- Verified facilities
- 376
- Capacity
- 98,768 MW
- +83,026 MW planned
- Top-3 operator share
- 42%
- of tracked MW
- Supplier links
- 148
- 96 companies
Anomalies that warrant review
How we flagDescriptive flags, not editorial claims.
Permits granted unusually fast
0Issued <14 days after application — verify regulatory process.
→ permit timing review
(awaiting Phase 6 seed)
Operators with 3+ ownership layers
0Chain depth ≥3 — shell stacking signal.
→ ownership review
(awaiting Phase 6 seed)
Subsidies > $1M per claimed job
10Disclosed subsidy ÷ claimed jobs exceeds $1M.
→ benefit-cost review
Facilities with no sources
1Verified entries that lack any cited URL.
→ review provenance
No power source disclosed
5No primary energy source recorded — can't assess emissions.
→ data gap
Countries with high operator concentration
25HHI ≥ 2500 — single operator dominates national MW.
→ market structure review
- AE
- BE
- CN
- ID
- IL
Operators ≥30pp behind clean-energy commitment
23Public commitment vs. actual carbon-free MW share.
→ claim verification
- Meta
- Amazon Web Services
- Microsoft
- Oracle
Single-supplier dependency (3+ categories)
0One vendor serves 3+ functional categories at the same site.
→ supply concentration review
Greenwash gap
Clean-energy commitment vs. actual carbon-free MW.
| Operator | Commitment | By | Actual carbon-free | Gap | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta | 100% | 2020 | 9.4% | +90.6pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Amazon Web Services | 100% | 2025 | 18.8% | +81.2pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Microsoft | 100% | 2025 | 50.6% | +49.4pp | behind | src ↗ |
| Oracle | 100% | 2025 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| 100% | 2030 | 54.1% | +45.9pp | behind | src ↗ | |
| Digital Realty | 100% | 2030 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| TeraWulf | 91% | 2024 | 44.7% | +46.3pp | behind | src ↗ |
| QTS Data Centers | 100% | 2025 | 5.1% | +94.9pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Switch | 100% | 2016 | 88.1% | +11.9pp | close | src ↗ |
| Vantage Data Centers | 100% | 2030 | 25% | +75pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Verne | 100% | 2020 | 16.7% | +83.3pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| atNorth | 100% | 2020 | 31.4% | +68.6pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| YTL Corporation | 100% | 2050 | 100% | 0pp | on track | src ↗ |
| NTT Global Data Centers | 100% | 2040 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Cologix | 100% | 2030 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Aligned Data Centers | 100% | 2024 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Stack Infrastructure | 100% | 2030 | 11.8% | +88.2pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Naver | 100% | 2040 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Data4 | 100% | 2030 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| SoftBank | 100% | 2030 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| OVHcloud | 100% | 2025 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Equinix | 100% | 2030 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| CyrusOne | 100% | 2030 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Hydro66 | 100% | 2015 | 100% | 0pp | on track | src ↗ |
| Telefónica Tech | 100% | 2030 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
| Scaleway | 100% | 2017 | 0% | +100pp | wide gap | src ↗ |
Gap = commitment % − actual carbon-free MW % (solar/wind/hydro/geothermal/nuclear). Public commitments per operator press; actual derived from facility power-source field. Operator press claims and sourced facility data — community findings flow can dispute either side.